To share or not share, that’s your call with Waterfox’s more powerful Private Browsing feature. Now Waterfox is even faster – with the quickest startups and less hang time! That means windows and tabs load quicker for lightweight browsing that doesn’t hog your computer’s memory. It offers 100% Firefox Add-on Compatibility and 64-bit Plugin Support. This browser is made with one thing in mind: speed. Just converting Mozilla’s source code for 64-bit Windows isn’t enough Waterfox takes it to another level with unique tweaks which help it exploit the speed of 64-bit systems. Software designed for 64-bit Windows editions can provide faster RAM and processing speeds and more excellent stability in 64-bit systems. It is a modified version of the Firefox source code specifically for machines running 64-bit versions of Windows. It is full offline installer standalone setup of Waterfox 2022 Free Download for supported version of windows. The program and all files are checked and installed manually before uploading, program is working perfectly fine without any problem. Again, I don't know if it's Yahoo's doing or Waterfox's, or some kind of deal between them, but it definitely is not the format I'm seeing with v.16 and those other browsers (Win 7 or 8).Waterfox Classic 2022.01 Free Download New and Latest Version for Windows. For me, and I suspect many many others, a large part of the value of Yahoo's home page has been taken away with this layout. Financial quotes have also been moved to the right column, instead of being a single small line under the main news categoy. Instead of separate news categories with small sized one-line article leads down the center, easy to peruse at a glance with mouse, the categories are now top tabbed - all or one category at a time - and articles have large 1 to 2 line heads, followed by 1 to 3 lines of text and lots of blank space. The reason? I don't know if it is Yahoo's doing or Waterfox's or both in cohoots, but Yahoo's home page (logged in) news categories, a key element of their home page, have been rendered effectively unusable with Waterfox 18, vs. If Waterfox were my main browser, I'd go back to 16. Waterfox is well worth running if you’re using a 64-bit version of Windows and want to push the performance envelope as far as you can. It’s also important to note that Waterfox shares your Firefox settings, so should you come to uninstall it, don’t select the option to delete all personal information if you’re still using Firefox. You’ll also find handy links to 64-bit versions of Flash, Silverlight and Sun Java on the Waterfox download page too, while all add-ons that work in Firefox should work with Waterfox too. Note, because the app is 64-bit, you’ll need to have installed the 64-bit version of Microsoft's Visual C++ 2010 Redistributable to avoid an MSVCR100.DLL missing error message when you try to launch the app. Aside from its name on the menu at the top of the main window, there’s nothing to differentiate it from Firefox. This makes it instantly familiar to existing Firefox users – Waterfox is based on the current stable Firefox build, which means it functions in exactly the same way. This is a dedicated 64-bit browser based on Firefox’s open source code, compiled specifically for 64-bit versions of Windows, complete with optimizations to help speed things up a little more. Despite the growing popularity of 64-bit though, we're still in that transitional phase where many applications are still only available in 32-bit builds – they're compatible with 64-bit, but you get none of the performance benefits 64-bit computing can bring.įirefox is one such example: the latest Nightly build is available in 64-bit, but we're at least six months away from it making the transition through Aurora and Beta to a final release.įor those who can’t wait for Firefox to embrace 64-bit, take a look at Waterfox instead. 64-bit is the future of computing – and one obvious benefit of running a 64-bit version of Windows is the fact it allows you to access more than 3.5GB of RAM, helping speed up your computer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |